Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches
Date
Msg-id e44a59a2-84b7-e35f-a304-17b4769c644b@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On 2023-02-08 We 10:42, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 07.02.23 19:28, Tom Lane wrote:
I think Peter's misremembering the history, and OpenSSL 3*is*
supported in these branches.  There could be an argument for
not back-patching f0d2c65f17 on the grounds that pre-1.1.1 is
also supported there.  On the whole though, it seems more useful
today for that test to pass with 3.x than for it to pass with 0.9.8.

Ok, let's do it.


Done


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Wrong rows estimations with joins of CTEs slows queries by more than factor 500
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: tests against running server occasionally fail, postgres_fdw & tenk1