Re: xml type and encodings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nikolay Samokhvalov
Subject Re: xml type and encodings
Date
Msg-id e431ff4c0701150342w88e7eaex35c39048dc62bf95@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to xml type and encodings  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: xml type and encodings  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/15/07, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
Client encoding is A, server encoding is B.  Client sends an xml datum
that looks like this:

INSERT INTO table VALUES (xmlparse(document '<?xml version="1.0"
encoding="C"?><content>...</content>'));

Assuming that A, B, and C are all distinct, this could fail at a number
of places.

I suggest that we make the system ignore all encoding declarations in
xml data.  That is, in the above example, the string would actually
have to be encoded in client encoding B on the client, would be
converted to A on the server and stored as such.  As far as I can tell,
this is easily implemented and allowed by the XML standard.

In other words, in case when B != C server must trigger an error, right?

--
Best regards,
Nikolay

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: xml type and encodings
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: xml type and encodings