IMHO, Veil is very strange project. Instead of concentrating on good
support of updatable views, developers are trying to reinvent the
wheel. Actually, if restriction-and-projection views would be
updatable w/o overhead (such as creating rules), there'll no need in
such project. It's one of the major roles of views - provide mechanism
to secure the data.
Am I right?
On 13/10/05, Marc Munro <marc@bloodnok.com> wrote:
> Dave,
> Sorry to be so late in responding to this but I may have just the
> solution for you.
>
> Please check out Veil at pgfoundry. This is an add-on to Postgres that
> I think does just what you are looking for. As the developer of this
> project, I would be pleased to offer you assistance.
>
> http://veil.projects.postgresql.org/
>
>
> __
> Marc
>
> > Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:36:23 +0700
> > From: David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>
> > To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> > Subject: Setting up a fine-grained permission system
> > Message-ID: <433B6137.3070103@zara.6.isreserved.com>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Our current project requires a fine-grained permission system
> (row-level
> > and possibly column-level as well). We have a pretty large (tens of
> > thousands) of users in the 'party' table. I'm thinking of choosing
> > Unix-style security for now (adding 'ugo' and 'owner' and 'group'
> > columns to each table which access need to be regulated), but am
> unsure
> > about the column-level permission.
> >
> > Anyone has experiences to share on a similar system/requirement? Do
> you
> > do Unix-style or ACL? Is there a possibility in the medium/far future
> > that Postgres will have such a fine-grained permission system.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dave
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQBDTqpmUBr6u+c2wkERAsIvAJ4lCkYF+L9mYCqs8sPLOjEPsCn/OQCfTXUA
> TjtCjjbIrG4907a2tLHfKE8=
> =PSLJ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
--
Best regards,
Nikolay
