Re: [HACKERS] foreign partition DDL regression tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: [HACKERS] foreign partition DDL regression tests
Date
Msg-id e427a25a-91f1-be02-dbce-8b47ba867bac@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] foreign partition DDL regression tests  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] foreign partition DDL regression tests  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017/03/09 1:28, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> Ashutosh Bapat pointed out [0] that regression tests are missing for the
>> foreign partition DDL commands.  Attached patch takes care of that.
> 
> Committed.

Thanks.

> I didn't do anything about Ashutosh's comment that we could use ALTER
> FOREIGN TABLE rather than ALTER TABLE someplace; that didn't seem
> critical.

Attached is a patch to fix that, just in case.

> Also, the names of the objects in this test are kinda generic (pt2 et.
> al.) but they match the existing names in the same file (pt1, foo).
> If we're going to start differentiating those a little better, we
> should probably change them all, and as a separate commit.

Agreed.

Thanks,
Amit

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Need a builtin way to run all tests faster manner
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC] Personal presentation and request for clarification