Re: Interesting performance behaviour - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Joey Smith
Subject Re: Interesting performance behaviour
Date
Msg-id e41f745b040910150134ec678e@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Interesting performance behaviour  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-performance
> > shared_buffers = 1000
> > sort_mem = 1024
> > effective_cache_size = 1000
>
> effective_cache_size should be much higher, like 3/4 of your available RAM.
> This is probably the essence of your planner problem; the planner thinks you
> have no RAM.

I set effective_cache_size to 64000 on a machine with 2GB of physical
RAM, and the behaviour is exactly the same.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From:
Date:
Subject: effective_cache_size in 7.3.4?
Next
From: Joey Smith
Date:
Subject: Fwd: Interesting performance behaviour