Re: pg_receivexlog or archive_command - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andreas Kretschmer
Subject Re: pg_receivexlog or archive_command
Date
Msg-id e3ebc4bb-247e-bfcf-21e0-96cdcf633376@a-kretschmer.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_receivexlog or archive_command  (Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general

Am 23.09.19 um 13:44 schrieb Luca Ferrari:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:55 AM Andreas Kretschmer
> <andreas@a-kretschmer.de> wrote:
>> you can use both of them, and you should consider "Barman".
> If I remember well Barman uses pg_receivexlog when streaming, and
> archive_command when doing a "normal" backup.

Barman < version 2 can only archive_command, version 2 and higher can both.

> Also pgbackrest is another good tool for backup.
> The idea here should be not reinventing the wheel.
ack.

Regards, Andreas

> -- 
> 2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
> www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Luca Ferrari
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_receivexlog or archive_command
Next
From: Ron
Date:
Subject: Re: unable to drop index because it does not exists