Re: [patch] CLUSTER blocks scanned progress reporting - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: [patch] CLUSTER blocks scanned progress reporting
Date
Msg-id e363cdc6-68b6-1ca8-1351-9ef155f9e84a@oss.nttdata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [patch] CLUSTER blocks scanned progress reporting  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 2020/11/27 1:51, Fujii Masao wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2020/11/27 1:45, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 at 00:55, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> +                                * A heap scan need not return tuples for the last page it has
>>> +                                * scanned. To ensure that heap_blks_scanned is equivalent to
>>> +                                * total_heap_blks after the table scan phase, this parameter
>>> +                                * is manually updated to the correct value when the table scan
>>> +                                * finishes.
>>>
>>> So it's better to update this comment a bit? For example,
>>>
>>>       If the scanned last pages are empty, it's possible to go to the next phase
>>>       while heap_blks_scanned != heap_blks_total. To ensure that they are
>>>       equivalet after the table scan phase, this parameter is manually updated
>>>       to the correct value when the table scan finishes.
>>>
>>
>> PFA a patch with updated message and comment. I've reworded the
>> messages to specifically mention empty pages and the need for setting
>> heap_blks_scanned = total_heap_blks explicitly.
> 
> Thanks for updating the patch! It looks good to me.
> Barring any objection, I will commit this patch (also back-patch to v12).

Pushed. Thanks!

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Printing LSN made easy
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: A problem about partitionwise join