On 7/22/24 13:08, Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
>
>
>> On 22 Jul 2024, at 12:26, Tomas Vondra
>> <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>
>> I don't understand how would that solve the problem, can you
>> elaborate? Which of the values are you suggesting should be
>> replaced with the shared counter? lastlsn?
>
> I think during build we should consider index unlogged and always use
> GetFakeLSNForUnloggedRel() or something similar. Anyway we will
> calllog_newpage_range(RelationGetNumberOfBlocks(index)) at the end.
>
But that doesn't update the page LSN, which GiST uses to detect
concurrent splits, no?
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
