Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently
Date
Msg-id e23ad4ec-e03e-456d-9fa0-b681a6ab8a55@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently  (Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>)
Responses Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently
List pgsql-docs
Tree view 
On 19.11.23 21:34, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> * Making explicit references to ISO 8601:2004 where section numbers are
>    referenced.  Mostly in source comments but also a couple of places in
>    the docs.  This is about avoiding confusion as ISO 8601:2019 has been
>    published since then, with different section numbers[1].  The pre-2004
>    editions also have different section numbers.  References to general
>    ISO 8601 concepts (e.g. week numbers) are left unchanged because those
>    are not tied to any particular edition.

Maybe we should change the references to the 2019 edition instead?

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Erik Wienhold
Date:
Subject: Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently
Next
From: Erik Wienhold
Date:
Subject: Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently