Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Date
Msg-id e20fd0d1313b4f02c91b3088a0514319@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
Responses Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0  (Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>)
Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


>> 9.0.

> You don't have a code-name. All the cool kids have code-names
> for their projects.

I've got one: "Postgres"

Better yet, how about we bite the bullet and make the name change
official. Seems like a major version bump is the right time
to do it.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201001210726
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAktYR90ACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjDmACfVud6mJMRDX5poG1c+Y+z4UYw
jUIAnR9+OaIHNDwT3ZhiCivMF3skGJwn
=fWzV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Leonardo F
Date:
Subject: Re: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
Next
From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0