> I am extending phrase operator <n> is such way that it will have <n,m>
> syntax that means from n to m words, so I will use such syntax (<n,m>)
> further. I found that a AROUND(N) b is exactly the same as a <-N,N> b
> and it can be replaced while parsing. So, what do you think of such
> idea? In this patch I have noticed some unobvious behavior.
I think new operator should be a subject for separate patch. And I prefer idea
about range phrase operator.
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
