Re: pg_rewind vs superuser - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pg_rewind vs superuser
Date
Msg-id e1570ba6-4459-d9b2-1321-9449adaaef4c@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_rewind vs superuser  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: pg_rewind vs superuser
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-04-04 12:43, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I would like to apply this down to 9.5 for the checkpoint part and
> down to 11 for the role part, so if anybody has any comments, please
> feel free.

How about some tests to show that this is actually true?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Yuzuko Hosoya"
Date:
Subject: RE: Problem with default partition pruning
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Weaker shmem interlock w/o postmaster.pid