Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb
Date
Msg-id e103a8a1-a6f1-5709-6ac6-95684fd5bff2@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb  (Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb  (Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 28/01/2019 17:47, Jesper Pedersen wrote:
> On 1/28/19 11:30 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
>> IMHO you should use long option name '--jobs' like others.
>>
> 
> Thanks for your feedback !
> 
> Done, and v4 attached.

I would drop the changes in pgupgrade.sgml.  We don't need to explain
what doesn't happen, when nobody before now ever thought that it would
happen.

Also, we don't need the versioning stuff.  The new cluster in pg_upgrade
is always of the current version, and we know what that one supports.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Nishant, Fnu"
Date:
Subject: Re: possible deadlock: different lock ordering for heap pages
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposed refactoring of planner header files