Re: Premature view materialization in 8.2? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jonathan Ellis
Subject Re: Premature view materialization in 8.2?
Date
Msg-id e06563880704060724n17a1de97j5d64fafc1ea95b21@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Premature view materialization in 8.2?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Premature view materialization in 8.2?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
On 4/6/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Jonathan Ellis" <jonathan@utahpython.org> writes:
> > On 4/5/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >>> Is this a regression, or a "feature" of 8.2?
> >>
> >> Hard to say without EXPLAIN ANALYZE output to compare.
>
> > To my eye they are identical other than the speed but perhaps I am
> > missing something.
>
> Yeah, it sure is the same plan, and 8.2 seems to be a tad faster right
> up to the hash join on user_id.  Is user_id a textual datatype?  I'm
> wondering if the 8.2 installation is using a different locale --- the
> speed of simple string comparisons can be horrifically worse in some
> locales compared to others.

user_id is an int; they are both C locale.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Michael Stone
Date:
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA