On 4/2/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> "Jonathan Ellis" <jbellis+ns@gmail.com> writes:
> > I have many many instances of these two problems in pg_dump's output:
>
> > 1) function code don't seem to be taken into account for dependencies
>
> No, it isn't, and this should not matter because pg_dump takes care to
> turn off check_function_bodies.
Ah, that was the problem -- I manually split my dump file into two sections,
so only the first section had this set. Sorry.
BTW, what was the other problem?
>
Meh, I realized that one was a PEBKC and removed it, but forgot to fix the
preamble. Yesterday wasn't a good day for me. :)