Re: [HACKERS] segment size depending *_wal_size defaults (wasincreasing the default WAL segment size) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: [HACKERS] segment size depending *_wal_size defaults (wasincreasing the default WAL segment size)
Date
Msg-id e03b81bf-16aa-64f8-c083-aa02863683e3@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] segment size depending *_wal_size defaults (wasincreasing the default WAL segment size)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 08/30/2017 03:16 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-08-30 10:14:22 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>>> On 2017-08-30 09:49:14 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>>> Do you think that we should worry about wal segment sizes higher than
>>>> 2GB? Support for int64 GUCs is not here yet.
>>>
>>> 1GB will be the limit anyway.
>>
>> Yeah, but imagine that we'd want to raise that even more up.
> 
> I'm doubtfull of that. But even if, it'd not be hard to GUC support.
> 

It's not hard - it's just a lot of copy-pasting of infrastructure code.
Incidentally, I already have a patch doing that, as we had to add that
support to XL, and I can submit it to PostgreSQL. Might save some boring
coding.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Arthur Zakirov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Separate log file for extension