Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was: comp.databases.postgresql.*) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Vern
Subject Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was: comp.databases.postgresql.*)
Date
Msg-id dztyopvctgd@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-general
Marc G. Fournier wrote in Msg <coono0$p91$1@news.hub.org>:

> it can't *hurt* to have the group ...

I respectfully disagree with you, Marc.  :)

The PGSQL* hierarchy is now well distributed, and there is no need for
a comp.* group.  If anything, the ungated comp.* group will confuse
newbies into thinking that that is the best forum for PostGreSQL advice
... instead of the PGSQL.* hierarchy.  None of the developers and power
users of these lists will be answering questions in the comp.* group,
if created, so it would be better to not create the group at all.

Vern

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Vern
Date:
Subject: New PostGreSQL Newsgroup - VOTE TO BEGIN
Next
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: help with plpgsql function called by trigger