Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 12:16:12PM +0300, Nicolay A Vasiliev wrote:
>
>>There are a number of different PL-languages. How do you select these
>>languages? I think PL/SQL is more fast or am I wrong?
>>
>>Suggest me please your way of PL language selection.
>
>
> Well, it kind of depends on what you want to do. Different languages
> are good for different things. If you want pattern matching you might
> want pl/perl.
Oh, great! It sounds good cause we use Perl hardly in our work and
understand something in this language :).
> For simple SQL stuff, pl/sql has the advantage that it
> can be inlined. pl/pgsql looks similar to oracles offering, some people
> like that.
I thought the same. When I worked with Sybase Adaptive SQL Anywhere few
years ago I liked its Watcom SQL dialect for its power of computation
possibilities.
>
> The languages are all fast enough that you should really consider
> maintainability, readabilty and coding experience before speed...
This is very important especially in case of active using of database in
insert/update conditions. And I thought PL/SQL is more "native". If they
are equally by maintainability - so, PosgreSQL is fine a lot :).
Regards,
