Re: [GENERAL] Up to date conventional wisdom re max shared_buffersize? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Up to date conventional wisdom re max shared_buffersize?
Date
Msg-id dfb3e2d5-e9ee-7cef-2d16-c2b41726bbc7@cox.net
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Up to date conventional wisdom re max shared_buffer size?  (Jerry Sievers <gsievers19@comcast.net>)
List pgsql-general
On 09/19/2017 05:00 PM, Jerry Sievers wrote:
[snip]
> The DB is 10TB total size with OLTP plus some occasional heavy batching
> which frequently correlates with degradation that requires intervention.
>
> Unrelated server problem forced us to relocate from a Debian/Wheezy 3.x
> kernel 1T 144 CPU to the even bigger box mentioned earlier.  And we wen
> up a major kernel version also in the process.

How did you backup/restore a 10TB db?

-- 
World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification



-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Cook
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pgcrypto encrypt
Next
From: Alex Samad
Date:
Subject: [GENERAL] problem