Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL"
Date
Msg-id df776aee-7178-c531-8a34-2f1c07733ec1@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL"  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL"
Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL"
List pgsql-hackers
On 6/10/21 5:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Gavin Flower <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz> writes:
>> On 11/06/21 8:17 am, Isaac Morland wrote:
>>> ... But then there is "an historic occasion" so go figure.
>> The 'h' in 'historic' is silent, at least it used to be -- I think now 
>> it is almost silent.  So using 'an historic occasion' is correct.
> It's silent according to the Brits, I believe.  In America, the
> pronunciation varies.
>
>             


I suspect "an historic" is bordering on archaic even in the UK these days.


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL"
Next
From: Álvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Race condition in InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots()