On 11/6/23 01:05, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 10:10:42AM -0400, David Steele wrote:
>> We are still planning to address this issue in the back branches.
>
> FWIW, redesigning the backend code in charge of doing base backups in
> the back branches is out of scope. Based on a read of the proposed
> patch, it includes catalog changes which would require a catversion
> bump, so that's not going to work anyway.
I did not mean this patch -- rather some variation of what Thomas has
been working on, more than likely.
Regards,
-David
