Re: [PATCH] Expand character set for ltree labels - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [PATCH] Expand character set for ltree labels
Date
Msg-id df318c06-5df3-0ceb-5bbb-37d3c57a2598@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Expand character set for ltree labels  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2023-01-06 Fr 11:29, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> Regardless of the punycode issue, allowing hyphens in ltree labels seems
>> quite reasonable. I haven't reviewed the patch yet, but if it's OK I
>> intend to commit it.
> No objection to allowing hyphens.  If we're going to increase the length
> limit, how about using 1000 characters?  AFAICS we could even get away
> with 10K, but it's probably best to hold a bit or two in reserve in case
> we ever want flags or something associated with labels.
>

OK, done that way.


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Cygwin cleanup
Next
From: Arne Roland
Date:
Subject: Permute underscore separated components of columns before fuzzy matching