Re: Oracle v. Postgres 9.0 query performance - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From tv@fuzzy.cz
Subject Re: Oracle v. Postgres 9.0 query performance
Date
Msg-id df2c0e011c42342aa5d975028809d051.squirrel@sq.gransy.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Oracle v. Postgres 9.0 query performance  (Tony Capobianco <tcapobianco@prospectiv.com>)
Responses Re: Oracle v. Postgres 9.0 query performance
List pgsql-performance
> On Postgres, this same query takes about 58 minutes (could not run
> explain analyze because it is in progress):
>
> pg_dw=# explain CREATE TABLE ecr_opens with (FILLFACTOR=100)
> pg_dw-# as
> pg_dw-# select o.emailcampaignid, count(memberid) opencnt
> pg_dw-#   from openactivity o,ecr_sents s
> pg_dw-#  where s.emailcampaignid = o.emailcampaignid
> pg_dw-#  group by o.emailcampaignid;
>                                                  QUERY
> PLAN
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  GroupAggregate  (cost=0.00..1788988.05 rows=9939 width=12)
>    ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.00..1742467.24 rows=9279316 width=12)
>          ->  Index Scan using ecr_sents_ecid_idx on ecr_sents s
> (cost=0.00..38.59 rows=479 width=4)
>          ->  Index Scan using openact_emcamp_idx on openactivity o
> (cost=0.00..3395.49 rows=19372 width=12)
>                Index Cond: (o.emailcampaignid = s.emailcampaignid)
> (5 rows)
>

Please, post EXPLAIN ANALYZE, not just EXPLAIN. Preferably using
explain.depesz.com.

regards
Tomas


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tony Capobianco
Date:
Subject: Oracle v. Postgres 9.0 query performance
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle v. Postgres 9.0 query performance