Re: 10.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: 10.0
Date
Msg-id dec90bc5-8783-3e4d-cc68-8e9b79fd014b@BlueTreble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 10.0  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 6/14/16 3:38 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 06/14/2016 12:46 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
>
>> Any ideas on naming for such a function? version_detail()? I suppose
>> while we're at this we might as well provide the compile details as well.
>
> version(detail) or version(verbose)

I don't think that makes as much sense as a different function name, 
since the output is fundamentally different than version().
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)   mobile: 512-569-9461



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Seltenreich
Date:
Subject: Should pg_export_snapshot() and currtid() be tagged parallel-unsafe?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Use of index for 50% column restriction