On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Brett W. McCoy is thought to have said:
> Is this the same as what in SQL92 are known as 'logical schemas' (versus
> the physical schema)? They aren't supported yet in PostgreSQL, but are in
> the TODO list, according to http://www.postgresql.org/docs/todo.html,
Thanks. I didn't think to look in that list for some reason. Same list
contains a few other things I've been looking for too, but didn't know
what to call them.
I did find it kinda funny that it's listed under "exotic", though.
Eh, it's a good, solid database. I'll find a way around it till someone
good at writing databases sits down and thinks "Drats, I could really use
one of those exotic logical schemas to access multiple tables from
multiple databases right about now. Why -- I'll write one!". ;)
Thanks.
--
RJohnson.com -+- Ron Johnson <rjohnson@rjohnson.com>
http://www2.rjohnson.com/me/2Ns9qoTqQqDyi/
