Re: Declarative partitioning - another take - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Date
Msg-id dce7bde4-f2b8-59a6-71fd-d5357ac1c990@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Declarative partitioning - another take  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2016/10/27 3:13, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> I will include these changes in the next version of patches I will post
>> soon in reply to [1].
>> [1]
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoYJcUTcN7vVgg54GHtffH11JJWYZnfF4KiRxjV-iaACQg%40mail.gmail.com
> 
> How soon?  Tempus fugit, and tempus in this release cycle fugit
> particularly quickly.  It looks like the last revision of these
> patches was on October 7th, and that's now more than 2 weeks ago.  We
> need to get moving here if this is going to happen this cycle.

Sorry about the delay, I'll post no later than tomorrow.

Thanks,
Amit





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
Next
From: "Karl O. Pinc"
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function