Re: panic failed to add item - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: panic failed to add item
Date
Msg-id dcc563d10911201514ub0ff1b9m9379c81c9bbd3e21@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: panic failed to add item  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> writes:
>> Access is pretty random actually, and fill factor on this database is
>> 100% because it doesn't really get updated, just appended to.  There
>> are a lot of parallel insertions going on if that helps.
>
> Do you mean you actually have fillfactor set somewhere?  It didn't show
> on the \d output.

No, I just assumed it was 100% still by default.  Did that change?

> Is this a 32-bit or 64-bit machine?

64 bit.  Centos / RHEL 5.3 running the -95 or so Centos 5.2 kernel
because later kernels cause problems with the Areca 1680 series RAID
array controller kicking offline at odd times

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: panic failed to add item
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_standby instructions