Not me. I've fed and watered PostgreSQL for the better part of a
decade and did so for Oracle for three years. At no point did I want
to switch preference from pgsql ro Oracle. There were some things
Oracle did I wanted to see in pgsql, but the overall package of pgsql
is way better in my opinion. And part of that is NOT putting things
in core before they're ready.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Mike Christensen<mike@kitchenpc.com> wrote:
> We need to stop this thread, you guys are making me want to ditch Postgres
> and get Oracle (after taking out a second mortgage on my house that is)..
>
> Mike
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> wrote:
>>
>> Craig Ringer wrote on 24.06.2009 04:07:
>>>
>>> Thomas Kellerer wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Mike Christensen wrote on 23.06.2009 19:37:
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone actually have that (any node can go down and the others
>>>>> still
>>>>> replicate amongst themselves?)
>>>>
>>>> I think this is what Oracle promises with their RAC technology.
>>>
>>> Isn't RAC a shared-storage cluster?
>>
>> As far as I know it is also a cluster of servers which can even hand over
>> the processing of a single statement "in-flight" if the node goes down that
>> is current processing the statement.
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
>
--
When fascism comes to America, it will be intolerance sold as diversity.
