Re: PostgreSQL Windows x64 Build - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: PostgreSQL Windows x64 Build
Date
Msg-id dcc563d10811151351g75f41ccm2981822642421ec@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL Windows x64 Build  ("Serge Fonville" <serge.fonville@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Serge Fonville
<serge.fonville@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been using PostgreSQL for quite a while now.
> And (pure out of interest) been trying to build a Windows x64 version of it.

There was a discussion of this very subject here a few months ago, you
should look that up.  It explained a lot of the reasons there isn't
currently a 64bit windows build.  One of the reasons I remember is
that postgresql's "shared memory" design is slow when you allocate
large amounts of it in windows, and that's one of the few reasons for
needing a 64 bit version of pgsql.  I remember a few more reasons
popping up.  I'm guessing it's a subject for the -hackers list though.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum Full is *hideously* slow!
Next
From: "Phoenix Kiula"
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum Full is *hideously* slow!