Re: Performance of views - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: Performance of views
Date
Msg-id dcc563d10811021759o1f73f252h7237aa13fd267e94@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance of views  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: Performance of views
Re: Performance of views
List pgsql-general
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> Simon,
>
>>   * Higher overhead mapping to original tables and indexes
>
> This just plain isn't true in PG, at least, and I'd think most other
> sensible databases..

Note that, at least in older versions, MySQL completely materialized a
temporary table from a view, then used that for the view.  This is
horribly inefficient, and results in a lot of people thinking views
are slow.  Not sure if this has been addressed in MySQL yet, don't
really care anymore, since I rarely use mysql for anything anymore.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Are there plans to add data compression feature to postgresql?
Next
From: Sam Mason
Date:
Subject: Re: Are there plans to add data compression feature to postgresql?