Re: 8.3.3 stability ? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: 8.3.3 stability ?
Date
Msg-id dcc563d10809171343h187ff948ie1b40d1aed44bd87@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.3.3 stability ?  (Ben <bench@silentmedia.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Ben <bench@silentmedia.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
>> 8.3 has much better performance for certain types of workloads,
>> especially with HOT updates, and the more efficient bg writer and
>> vacuuming seems many times faster than it was before.
>>
>> If I was deploying to production today, I'd use 8.3.3 no questions.
>
> Remember 8.3 also gives you the "opportunity" to fix all the sloppy code in
> your application that depends upon implicit casting. If that's as expensive
> for you to fix as it is for us, then you won't be moving to 8.3 any time
> soon.

Would you like to have some cheese???  :)

Out of 10s of thousands of lines of code, we fixed all the casting
problems we had in about two hours.  There were about 4 dozen
instances we found.  And a lot of them were things that needed fixing
anyway, like using substring on a date to get a month out of it.
Someone changes date style and that goes kaboom anyway.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Backend timeout
Next
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: updating to 8.3.x