Re: 4s query want to run faster - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: 4s query want to run faster
Date
Msg-id dcc563d10802211325t365388f1te340e7f9b7e18dd3@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 4s query want to run faster  ("Adonias Malosso" <malosso@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Well, all the row counts in expected and actual are pretty close.  I'm
guessing it's as optimized as it's likely to get.  you could try
mucking about with random_page_cost to force index usage, but indexes
are not always a win in pgsql, hence the seq scans etc...  If the
number of rows returned represents a large percentage of the total
number of rows in the table, then a seq scan is generally a win.  Note
that most all the time being spent in this query is on the Hash Join,
not on the seq scans.

Also, you should really update to 8.2.6 the latest 8.2 version.  Check
the release notes for the bugs that were fixed between 8.2.1 and 8.2.6

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Adonias Malosso"
Date:
Subject: Re: 4s query want to run faster
Next
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: 4s query want to run faster