Re: Performance on 8CPU's and 32GB of RAM - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: Performance on 8CPU's and 32GB of RAM
Date
Msg-id dcc563d10709050845k135d3c2erbe5b44933e898aa@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance on 8CPU's and 32GB of RAM  ("Carlo Stonebanks" <stonec.register@sympatico.ca>)
Responses Re: Performance on 8CPU's and 32GB of RAM
List pgsql-performance
On 9/5/07, Carlo Stonebanks <stonec.register@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> > Right, additionally NTFS is really nothing to use on any serious disc
> > array.
>
> Do you mean that I will not see any big improvement if I upgrade the disk
> subsystem because the client is using NTFS (i.e. Windows)

No, I think he's referring more to the lack of reliability of NTFS
compared to UFS / ZFS / JFS / XFS on unixen.

A faster disk subsystem will likely be a real help.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: optimize query with a maximum(date) extraction
Next
From: "Carlo Stonebanks"
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance on 8CPU's and 32GB of RAM