Re: Draft of 9.2 beta announcement, please revise/improve - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: Draft of 9.2 beta announcement, please revise/improve
Date
Msg-id dc23a52ccd8b829a491cc5da0824f561@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Draft of 9.2 beta announcement, please revise/improve  (Joshua Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


> in performance, vertical and horizontal scalability.

Reads awkward.

> Major performance and scalability advances ready to be tested in this version include:

s/ready to be tested//; ## Makes them sound very fragile and untested

> * JSON data support, permitting building hybrid document-relational databases
> * Range types, supporting new types of calendar, time-series and analytic applications
> * Multiple improvments to make database migrations easier

Can we add details to that last bullet? It's pretty vague in contrast
to the previous two.

> For a full listing of the ready-to-test features in version 9.2 beta

s/ready-to-test//;

> We depend on our community test the next verson in order to guarantee that
> it is high-performance and bug-free.

- From a marketing standpoint, that's a scary sentence.

/twocents

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201205071304
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAk+oAJUACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjrawCfWa2oW099JIoeKNOMDd2pDw8R
lY4AoJRvjP74XVHgHUj93E7g/+GmVPxG
=v+NG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: San Francisco pgDay December 8, Usenix LISA CfP
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Draft of 9.2 beta announcement, please revise/improve