Re: meson and check-tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: meson and check-tests
Date
Msg-id dc036284-96e4-4807-89bb-4c479272b59d@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: meson and check-tests  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2025-07-18 Fr 3:19 AM, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 11:22 AM Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 7:06 PM Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> It is added and marked as ready for the committer [1]. There are
>>> multiple 'Jian He' users in the commitfest app, so I couldn't add you
>>> as a reviewer; please add yourself.
>>>
>>> [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/51/5405/
>> In order to debug a failure in SQL/PGQ patch, I needed to run
>> regression test with some instrumentation which caused the regression
>> run to take more than 1000 seconds. The failure is seen only in one of
>> the tests. Spending 1000 seconds to reproduce or test patch just for
>> one test seems too expensive. If we commit this patch, we could
>> instead run check-tests equivalent in meson to save time and
>> resources. The patch is ready for a committer already.
> The patches still apply and the CF is in RFC state. Reattaching them
> to get some attention.
>


Committed


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: apply_scanjoin_target_to_paths and partitionwise join
Next
From: Corey Huinker
Date:
Subject: Re: CAST(... ON DEFAULT) - WIP build on top of Error-Safe User Functions