Re: RHEL repo package crc mismatches - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Brainmue
Subject Re: RHEL repo package crc mismatches
Date
Msg-id db5d0e5dff14e2fc84ba92ae7720e39e@weiller.eu
Whole thread Raw
In response to RHEL repo package crc mismatches  (Evan Rempel <erempel@uvic.ca>)
Responses Re: RHEL repo package crc mismatches  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-general
Hello Evan,

we have exactly the same problem and don't feel comfortable with it at the moment either.
We even synchronise several versions and this problem occurs with all of them.
Can anyone confirm that the packages have not been changed inadvertently but only the metadata is
wrong?
Here are the changes with us.

For the pgdg11 RHEL 7 repository:

[MIRROR] ogr_fdw_11-1.1.0-1.rhel7.x86_64.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match.
Calculated: c61d0bb8cdc2c386b57d8968b509f9fe7bf7693b3f86af730128797d087c0caa(sha256) Expected:
a963ae2eb874da055db63953cf0eb0d62e24d16abd6e8d4dab615ba4fadaefd8(sha256)
[MIRROR] ogr_fdw_11-llvmjit-1.1.0-1.rhel7.x86_64.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't
match. Calculated: 1be687c8721e7683f7efbfe51b9bd9532f7c7326d344e83e8928667cbc524cd3(sha256)
Expected: 52aa7c905fd802bfea5cf7e89b80b7523b2a16309575cdbe9d68df4179ec1f6b(sha256)
[MIRROR] pg_auto_failover_11-1.6.3-1.rhel7.x86_64.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't
match. Calculated: abd1ede633fe8dc7721e1e09783e300c8d5a5e9b226257c67969e2bfbf7ce4f9(sha256)
Expected: 0b29fc748639210c76af4b1870772780ba13a04698886e78514e7fb1baac9781(sha256)

For the pgdg13 RHEL 7 repository:

[MIRROR] ogr_fdw_13-1.1.0-1.rhel7.x86_64.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match.
Calculated: d2ea23dc8b866c09eb620187e40147daae1a60f2a31370a88fd119b08a5f8816(sha256) Expected:
a39bc56ebc34de96321af69f99862819fe36516775cb155f599c839c098a0030(sha256)
[MIRROR] ogr_fdw_13-llvmjit-1.1.0-1.rhel7.x86_64.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't
match. Calculated: f2d981ba5ae5e54ac420f881c27eaba3af6b506638feed9f686273272083b479(sha256)
Expected: 5e6baa1e8169da8251f4a3c47c8db0ab4344977c0ed4a8f1042d353a50e4e304(sha256)
[MIRROR] pg_auto_failover_13-1.6.3-1.rhel7.x86_64.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't
match. Calculated: 01ce463c8487d52986e347025266167135f0a866c37590c784e7e3e5d8e43817(sha256)
Expected: e35c32a27f5c97596d74fca03e416cb743bf188fdc0dfaf736cc68a20801a5c9(sha256)

For the pgdg14 RHEL 7 repository:

[MIRROR] pg_auto_failover_14-1.6.3-1.rhel7.x86_64.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't
match. Calculated: 7b72deadb029a8752717c832cde2e23d87e341037765086d88ac6d96816ebe89(sha256)
Expected: 55de94cebb1967c4f1edb1a0be14246173c05168261a76d141e819f607e83ee3(sha256)

Thank you for checking.

Greetings
Michael

3. Mai 2023 09:00, "Evan Rempel" <erempel@uvic.ca> schrieb:

> At our site we use reposync to copy the postgresql repositories to a local repository.
>
> When doing this on April 28 (and since) I exprience the following package checksum matching errors.
>
> For the pgdg13 RHEL 8 repository
>
> [MIRROR] pg_auto_failover_13-1.6.3-1.rhel8.x86_64.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't
> match. Calculated: 5196edcfe1d6af6c0e90ad9a25667613bdfa0731a84fa9a1dbaa7080b4a3caac(sha256)
> Expected: 8d4527c96e9c8a3ff86d75aa85c166899ee895e9522c6720223f0f93b658f8d6(sha256)
>
> [MIRROR] e-maj_13-4.0.1-1.rhel8.x86_64.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match.
> Calculated: f7576cb1cd22303cb3dbb2a86911ad3f9e57afa8472a31f1a6a1f176f708fa1d(sha256) Expected:
> 8c56cacb99771c4f06be2551988e553a70ea5e5459202e12e0e92fdeb7371621(sha256)
>
> For the pgdg12 RHEL 8 repository
>
> [MIRROR] pg_auto_failover_12-llvmjit-1.6.3-1.rhel8.x86_64.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum
> doesn't match. Calculated: 9bfdaccc3a151fd847bbb5e622a9384648cf963faacd90dc9b31cd433e23a3c0(sha256)
> Expected: aa5e3dc99cabfe22839ed0b9501a0099af139bf8551344a3b198ac048218ceee(sha256)
>
> I think it is just metadata information, but it sounds scary.
>
> Can anyone comment?
>
> --
> Evan



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Wen Yi
Date:
Subject: Can one user login in multile machine?
Next
From: Ron
Date:
Subject: Re: Can one user login in multile machine?