Concurrent CTE - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Artur Formella
Subject Concurrent CTE
Date
Msg-id db253d4b-322b-e75a-fc00-b5af4da41e6a@tme3c.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Concurrent CTE
Re: Concurrent CTE
Re: Concurrent CTE
AW: Concurrent CTE
List pgsql-general
Hello!
We have a lot of big CTE (~40 statements, ~1000 lines) for very dynamic 
OLTP content and avg response time 50-300ms. Our setup has 96 threads 
(Intel Xeon Gold 6128), 256 GB RAM and 12 SSD (3 tablespaces). DB size < 
RAM.
Simplifying the problem:

WITH aa as (
   SELECT * FROM table1
), bb (
   SELECT * FROM table2
), cc (
   SELECT * FROM table3
), dd (
   SELECT * FROM aa,bb
), ee (
   SELECT * FROM aa,bb,cc
), ff (
   SELECT * FROM ee,dd
), gg (
   SELECT * FROM table4
), hh (
   SELECT * FROM aa
)
SELECT * FROM gg,hh,ff /* primary statement */

Execution now:
time-->
Thread1: aa | bb | cc | dd | ee | ff | gg | hh | primary

And the question: is it possible to achieve more concurrent execution 
plan to reduce the response time? For example:
Thread1: aa | dd | ff | primary
Thread2: bb | ee | gg
Thread3: cc | -- | hh

Table1, table2 and table3 are located on separate tablespaces and are 
independent.
Partial results (aa,bb,cc,dd,ee) are quite big and slow (full text 
search, arrays, custom collations, function scans...).

We consider resigning from the CTE and rewrite to RX Java but we are 
afraid of downloading partial results and sending it back with WHERE 
IN(...).

Thanks!

Artur Formella




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Rob Sargent
Date:
Subject: Re: single sql, multiple schemas, one result set
Next
From: "Kumar, Virendra"
Date:
Subject: LDAP Bind Password