Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system
Date
Msg-id dad0ad12-9a99-11ba-e308-d6ba0793f729@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-03-27 18:09, Tom Lane wrote:
> My recollection of the discussion is that people argued that "postmaster"
> might be taken to have something to do with an e-mail server, and
> therefore we needed to stop using that name.  The lack of either follow-on
> complaints or follow-on action doesn't make me too well disposed to
> what is essentially that same argument over again.

The reason there was that the distinction was mostly useless and the
different command-line option parsing was confusing.  The name itself
was confusing but not in conflict with anything.

However, we do know that we are very bad at actually getting rid of
deprecated things.

How about we compromise in this thread and remove postmaster and leave
everything else as is. ;-)

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gavin Flower
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)