Hi,
On 2019/01/22 1:29, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2019-Jan-21, Amit Langote wrote:
>> With this,
>> ALTER TABLE ADD FOREIGN KEY's inheritance recursion path now looks
>> completely different from ALTER TABLE ADD CHECK's, but that's fine.
>> Actually, if we had the same "clone" approach for check constraints, which
>> both checks if a child already has the constraint being cloned and creates
>> one if not, we could do away with errors like the following:
>>
>> create table p (a int, constraint check_a check (a > 0)) partition by list
>> create table p1 (a int);
>> alter table p attach partition p1 for values in (1);
>> ERROR: child table is missing constraint "check_a"
>>
>> But of course that would be a different feature.
>
> Heh, I wasn't aware that this failed in this silly way. But yeah,
> that's a different feature and we would certainly not backpatch a fix
> for it.
Are you be willing to try to fix that in HEAD if someone sends a patch? :)
Thanks,
Amit
