Re: %2$, %1$ gettext placeholder replacement is not working under Win32 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nicolai Tufar
Subject Re: %2$, %1$ gettext placeholder replacement is not working under Win32
Date
Msg-id d80929390501221219324de7a@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: %2$, %1$ gettext placeholder replacement is not working under Win32  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] %2$, %1$ gettext placeholder replacement is not working under Win32  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:31:39 +0100, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> Nicolai Tufar wrote:
> > 1. I renamed snprintf() to pg_snprintf(), vsnprintf() to
> > pg_vsnprintf() and introduced pg_printf() that calls pg_vsnprintf().
>
> This is not necessary.  You will notice that we already have configure
> tests of snprintf format specifiers (%lld etc.), so using the original
> function names is OK even in that case.

how about a test for the thing like:
printf("%2$s %1$s!\n", "world", "Hello");
It is what I am trying to solve :(

> > 5. Before running regression test I always ran make install,
> > apparently because libpq is read from /usr/local/.
>
> That's because of the -rpath.

I see. Thanks for information.

>
> > 2. Why would we not just take FreeBSD's vfprintf() and use it
> > instead?
>
> Try it.  It's painful.

src/port/snprintf.c is not not a particularly pretty. And
after my rework it got even uglier. I have looked at
FreeBDS's one and it is not *that* complicated. Would
you like me to try to incorporate into PostgreSQL.
NetBSD's one is somewhat simplier but does not
support %n$ feature by the way.

> > 4. What %m format string is used for? And where is it handled. Do I
> > need to implement it?
>
> It's only used in the error reporting functions in the server and is
> handled there.  You don't need to worry about it.

Oh, that is a relief.

> Peter Eisentraut
Nicolai

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
Next
From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Merge pg_shadow && pg_group -- UNTESTED