> >Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Maybe we should have a pgfoundry project where all translations were
> > kept, and from which the main CVS could be updated
> > semi-automatically. Then we wouldn't have Peter checking out and
> > committing all the time.
>
>Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> That sounds like a fine idea. My only concern would be the
> "not-maintained-here" syndrome, which occurs every time some CVS tree
> contains a file that is actually maintained by an external group, thus
> blocking the maintainers of the former CVS tree from applying necessary
> fixes at times. Nevertheless, I think this is a winner. Let's
> consider it when we start the 8.1 cycle.
It is definitely a winner. And I don't think anyonwone from
core group will object since Peter will be the only one who updates
main CVS tree. Just appoint a maintainer or two with cvs commit
priveleges for each language. It will ease your routine workload greatly.
Best regards,
Nicolai
