Re: Simplify Win32 Signaling code - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Qingqing Zhou
Subject Re: Simplify Win32 Signaling code
Date
Msg-id d7n6at$plh$1@news.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Simplify Win32 Signaling code  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
List pgsql-patches
""Magnus Hagander"" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes
>
> Looking at this patch reminds me of another discussion we had:
>
> Signals sent by the postmaster *before the signaling code is running in
> the child* has to be handled.
>
> This is handled in the curernt code by creating the pipe in the
> postmaster and then inheriting it. You'll need something similar in this
> one - create the stuff in the postmaster and inherit it down. (this is
> the initial_signal_pipe and pgwin32_create_signal_listener(), which you
> removed)
>
> Sorry, forgot to bring this up earlier because I had completely forgot
> it. You'll find some details if you search the archives, I beleive.
>

Is this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers-win32/2004-11/msg00000.php

It is my fault to ignore this - I just *simply* removed those lines ... I
will look into the problem and come up with a patch.

Regards,
Qingqing




pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle date type compat. functions: next_day, last_day,
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle date type compat. functions: next_day, last_day,