Re: seq scan instead of index scan - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Karl Larsson
Subject Re: seq scan instead of index scan
Date
Msg-id d7650d320912171717t472527b9v4d8563b23e3241f3@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: seq scan instead of index scan  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: seq scan instead of index scan
List pgsql-performance
> Best bet is to post the real problem, not a semi-representational made 
> up one.  Unless the made up "test case" is truly representative and
>  recreates the failure pretty much the same was as the original.

I agree at some level but I generally believe other people won't read
a big mail like that. In this case it might come to a big post from me
one day soon. :-)

Thanks to all who helped me.

/ Karl Larsson

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: seq scan instead of index scan
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: seq scan instead of index scan