Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Date
Msg-id d737e3b0-1a02-c0b7-4a51-8b16eacaba24@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 22.05.23 19:35, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 13:07 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Here is my proposed patch for this.
> 
> The commit message makes it sound like lc_collate/ctype are completely
> obsolete, and I don't think that's quite right: they still represent
> the server environment, which does still matter in some cases.
> 
> I'd just say that they are too confusing (likely to be misused), and
> becoming obsolete (or less relevant), or something along those lines.
> 
> Otherwise, this is fine with me. I didn't do a detailed review because
> it's just mechanical.

I have committed this with some tuning of the commit message.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Tristan Partin"
Date:
Subject: Fix last unitialized memory warning
Next
From: 謝東霖
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve join_search_one_level readibilty (one line change)