Re: postgresql and xfs filesystrem - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Christopher Browne
Subject Re: postgresql and xfs filesystrem
Date
Msg-id d6d6637f0901251106s2e79467m1fe66b692a383508@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to postgresql and xfs filesystrem  (Ezra Taylor <ezra.taylor@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: postgresql and xfs filesystrem  (Andre Majorel <aym-2lqsgp@teaser.fr>)
Re: postgresql and xfs filesystrem  (Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at>)
List pgsql-admin
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Ezra Taylor <ezra.taylor@gmail.com> wrote:
> All:
>        Do any of you have gripes about using XFS with the latest version of
> postgres?

I'd not expect there to be much specific benefit to it...

I did some benchmarking, now quite a while ago, which showed XFS to
be, for a totally write-bound workload, a *few* percent better than
ext3/JFS, but note that this is only a minor difference.

The fact that XFS isn't one of the "more highly supported" filesystems
on Linux is something I'd consider a *way* more important factor.

When balancing "oh, maybe a tiny percentage faster" against "oh,
nobody will be in a position to offer much support if anything goes
wrong," I'll take "easier to support" any day.


--
http://linuxfinances.info/info/linuxdistributions.html
Robert Benchley  - "Drawing on my fine command of the English
language, I said nothing."

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Ezra Taylor
Date:
Subject: postgresql and xfs filesystrem
Next
From: Andre Majorel
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql and xfs filesystrem