20.11.2023 00:09, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 12:22 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
>
>> And here is a patch to implement that on master.
> Rationale and code look good to me.
>
>
I can also confirm that the patches proposed (for master and back branches)
eliminate WES leakage as expected.
Thanks for the fix!
Maybe you would find appropriate to add the comment
/* Convenience wrappers over ResourceOwnerRemember/Forget */
above ResourceOwnerRememberWaitEventSet
just as it's added above ResourceOwnerRememberRelationRef,
ResourceOwnerRememberDSM, ResourceOwnerRememberFile, ...
(As a side note, this fix doesn't resolve the issue #17828 completely,
because that large number of handles might be also consumed
legally.)
Best regards,
Alexander
