Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 6/16/23 11:56 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 7:37 PM Drouvot, Bertrand
> <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Please find attached V5 (a rebase of V4 posted up-thread).
>>
>> In addition to the "rebasing" work, the TAP test adds a test about conflict handling (logical slot invalidation)
>> relying on the work done in the "Minimal logical decoding on standby" patch series.
>>
>> I did not look more at the patch (than what's was needed for the rebase) but plan to do so.
>>
> 
> Are you still planning to continue working on this? 

Yes, I think it would be great to have such a feature in core.

> Some miscellaneous
> comments while going through this patch are as follows?

Thanks! I'll look at them and will try to come back to you by
mid of next week.

Also I think we need to handle the case of invalidated replication slot(s): should
we drop/recreate it/them? (as the main goal is to have sync slot(s) on the standby).

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com