Hi,
On Thu, 2025-12-25 at 13:16 +0800, Ruohang Feng wrote:
> I'm writing to inquire about the status of the sysupdates yum
> repositories. We've noticed that these repositories are now returning
> 404 errors, and I wanted to understand whether this is an intentional
> change or a temporary issue.
This is an intentional change. Removed them in full (see below)
> The howto page at https://yum.postgresql.org/howto/ still references
> the sysupdates repository, stating it "distributes LLVM and CLANG
> packages for Rocky Linux / AlmaLinux for the times when RHEL releases
> a minor update and clones need to take some time to catch up."
Sorry about that, forgot to remove mention to sysupdates repo from
there. Fixed.
>
> The repository definitions still exist in /etc/yum.repos.d/pgdg-
> redhat-all.repo (from pgdg-redhat-repo-42.0-63), causing dnf update to
> report errors when these repos are enabled.
Are you sure? I removed them along with -62. Can you please check if you
have an pgdg-redhat-all.repo.rpmnew file under /etc/yum.repos.d or not?
>
> Questions:
>
> Have the sysupdates repositories been intentionally removed or
> deprecated?
Yes. See this news item for details:
https://yum.postgresql.org/news/postgresql-rpms-multiple-rhel-minor-versions/
>
> If so, is there an alternative approach now recommended for
> Rocky/AlmaLinux users who need updated LLVM/Clang packages during the
> RHEL minor version lag period?
We now support multiple RHEL minor versions, so this is not a problem
anymore.
>
> Should users simply disable these repository definitions in their
> configurations going forward?
>
Again, latest repo RPMs do not have those.
> Thank you for your time and for all the work you do for the PostgreSQL
> community and happy holidays
You are welcome. Happy holidays!
Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
Open Source Solution Architect, PostgreSQL Major Contributor
BlueSky: @devrim.gunduz.org , @gunduz.org
