Re: [HACKERS] LDAPS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] LDAPS
Date
Msg-id d534cc9c-99ec-dae7-5b39-46e6ec60d324@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] LDAPS  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] LDAPS
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/26/17 15:53, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> This patch looks reasonable to me.  I have also seen occasional requests
> for this in the field.
> 
> If someone could test this on Windows, I think we could move ahead with it.

A small point on the test changes.  You change the test under
"diagnostic message", but I'm not sure why.  Do the changes invalidate
the existing test?

We should probably also add another "note" call to introduce the LDAPS
tests section.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Better testing coverage and unified coding for plpgsql loops
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures