Re: less than 2 sec for response - possible? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: less than 2 sec for response - possible?
Date
Msg-id d4f43413-7df2-c330-7445-2760eb0b9152@BlueTreble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: less than 2 sec for response - possible?  (trafdev <trafdev@mail.ru>)
Responses Re: less than 2 sec for response - possible?
List pgsql-performance
On 7/9/16 12:26 PM, trafdev wrote:
> So does that mean Postgres is not capable to scan\aggregate less than 10
> mln rows and deliver result in less than 2 seconds?

That's going to depend entirely on your hardware, and how big the rows
are. At some point you're simply going to run out of memory bandwidth,
especially since your access pattern is very scattered.

> On 07/06/16 09:46, trafdev wrote:
>> Well, our CPU\RAM configs are almost same...
>>
>> The difference is - you're fetching\grouping 8 times less rows than I:

Huh? The explain output certainly doesn't show that.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)   mobile: 512-569-9461


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: slony rpm help slony1-95-2.2.2-1.rhel6.x86_64
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: DELETE takes too much memory